Sunday, May 20, 2012

Walk-ins in ED Vs GP out of hour service

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 9;11:94.

Walk-ins seeking treatment at an emergency department or general practitioner out-of-hours service: a cross-sectional comparison.

Source

Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Corinne.Chmiel@usz.ch

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Emergency Departments (ED) in Switzerland are faced with increasing numbers of patients seeking non-urgent treatment. The high rate of walks-ins with conditions that may be treated in primary care has led to suggestions that those patients would best cared for in a community setting rather than in a hospital. Efficient reorganisation of emergency care tailored to patients needs requires information on the patient populations using the various emergency services currently available. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences between the characteristics of walk-in patients seeking treatment at an ED and those of patients who use traditional out-of-hours GP (General Practitioner) services provided by a GP-Cooperative (GP-C).

METHODS:

In 2007 and 2009 data was collected covering all consecutive patient-doctor encounters at the ED of a hospital and all those occurring as a result of contacting a GP-C over two evaluation periods of one month each. Comparison was made between a GP-C and the ED of the Waid City Hospital in Zurich. Patient characteristics, time and source of referral, diagnostic interventions and mode of discharge were evaluated. Medical problems were classified according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2). Patient characteristics were compared using non-parametric tests and multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate independent determinants for contacting a GP-C or an ED.

RESULTS:

Overall a total of 2974 patient encounters were recorded. 1901 encounters were walk-ins and underwent further analysis (ED 1133, GP-C 768). Patients consulting the GP-C were significantly older (58.9 vs. 43.8 years), more often female (63.5 vs. 46.9%) and presented with non-injury related medical problems (93 vs. 55.6%) in comparison with patients at the ED. Independent determining factors for ED consultation were injury, male gender and younger age. Walk-in distribution in both settings was equal over a period of 24 hours and most common during daytime hours (65%).Outpatient care was predominant in both settings but significantly more so at the GP-C (79.9 vs. 85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS:

We observed substantial differences between the two emergency settings in a non gate-keeping health care system. Knowledge of the distribution of diagnoses, their therapy, of diagnostic measures and of the factors which determine the patients' choice of the ED or the GP-C is essential for the efficient allocation of resources and the reduction of costs.

Images from this publication.See all images (5) Free text

Figure 2
Figure 4
Figure 1
Figure 3
Figure 5

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Approach to ALTE

 A mother brings in a 2 week old neonate with a history choking that said
 morning, turning blue and becoming limp. Same occurred while feeding. No
 other history was elicited.  When examined, neonate had temp of 98 degrees
 Fahrenheit, pulse rate of140 bpm, no other vitals recorded. When examined,
 the child was active, alert and the cardiovascular and abdominal
 examinations were reportedly normal. However, a few crepitations were
 elicited in the left lung base.   How will  you approach this case?
(This article is based on a case posed by Dr.Celeste Maycock,a real advocate of academic excellence) 
 As per definition this neonate fit in ALTE ( Acute Life Threatening Event). ALTE is subjective to care provider but it is important enough to be careful in managing this type of case as well as it is paramount to document care fully. Let us understand component of ATLE:
Frightenning to parents or care provider
blue (cynosis)
limping (loss of tone)
choking (unable to breath)
So this is a case of ATLE
Pt. came : need Red card inside : to be directed to ER: immediate vitals including RBG and SpO2
While looking at neonate place to medium  flow oxygen,Monitor Airway, breathing, circulation (ABCs) with respiratory compromise, establish an airway & provide supportive therapy (e.g., oxygen, mechanical ventilation) Monitor Vital signs
  • Establish vascular access for sampling blood ):
  • If sepsis is suspected or another specific cause is not identified, start on broad spectrum antibiotics (e.g., ampicillin and gentamycin) after obtaining a CBC, urinalysis, blood & urine cultures (if possible). Left untreated, sepsis may lead to pulmonary disease & left ventricular dysfunction.
  • Administering meds (if needed.  kept on talking with mother and get all information from the mother  ante natal,perinatal including baby's last 2 week (for this case):
Now go for differential  one by one for  each component of ALTE
CYNOTIC:
Pregnancy HX ___>  Associated causes of cyanosis
  • Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) -->TTN (ransient tachypnea of the newborn) (, RDS, hypoglycemia, TGA
  • Oligohydramnios-->Pulmonary hypoplasia
  • Pregnancy induced hypertension -->IUGR, polycythemia, hypoglycemia
  • Lithium intake (1st trimester)--->Ebstein’s anomaly
  • Advanced maternal age->Trisomy 21 associated with many congenital heart defects (cyanotic and acyanotic)
Labour Hx----> Associated causes of cyanosis
  • PROM, fever, GBS +ve -->Sepsis
  • Sedatives/anesthetics--->Respiratory depression, apnea
  • C-section -->TTN, PPHN (persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn)
  • Preterm infant-->RDS
  • Meconium-->MAS (pneumonia)
   YOUR DIFFERENTIAL STARTS  HERE......MOTHER's HX FIRST
 
Do thorough Physical examination:  I always consider  dealing with neonate is almost a vetrenary practice: Neonate  doesnot say any thing.
 Look at the neonate differentiate cynosis is whether peripheral or central
 Look at the vitals,
     1/signs of respiratory distress : tachypnea, retractions, nasal flaring & grunting usually indicate a respiratory problem
     2/Congenital heart disease : absent or effortless tachypnea.
     3/Sepsis often has the following findings: peripheral cyanosis, HR, Increase  RR, Decrease BP, Increase/Decrease temp (DDX:  left-sided obstructive lesions:  hypoplastic left heart syndrome, critical aortic stenosis & severe coarctation of the aorta).
  4/Rule out choanal atresia.  If in doubt, attempt to insert a catheter through the nares
Listen for murmurs: a systolic murmur audible in most forms of cyanotic CHD (exception:  d-TGA with intact ventricular septum & no pulmonary stenosis).
Assess the abdomen: scaphoid abdomen in diaphgragmatic hernia
Consider neurological disorders: observe for apnea and periodic breathing, which may be related to immaturity of the nervous system.  Seizures can cause cyanosis if the infant fails to breathe during the episodes.
Tracheal atresia with tracheooesophageal connection can give cynosis with feeding effort.
Here it becomes imperative to think about the various mechanism of cyanosis. Then, organize your thoughts by anatomical systems.

Ventilation/perfusion mismatch : delivery

  • Airway disease: transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), pneumonia, aspiration (meconium, blood, amniotic fluid), atelectasis, diaphragmatic hernia, pulmonary hypoplasia, pulmonary hemorrhage, CCAM
  • Extrinsic compression of the lungs: pneumothorax, pleural effusion, hemothorax,
  • Intracardiac: The 5 T’s: Tetralogy of Fallot, Tricuspid atresia, Transposition of the great arteries, Total anomalous pulmonary venous return, Truncus arteriosus; and pulmonary atresia, Ebsteins anomaly (abnormal tricuspid valve), hypoplastic left heart (shunts)
  • Great vessel level: persistent pulmonary, hypertension of the newborn
  • Intrapulmonary level: pulmonary arteriovenous malformation

Alveolar Hypoventilation


  • CNS depression: asphyxia, maternal sedation, intraventricular hemorrhage, seizure, meningitis, encephalitis
  • Airway obstruction: choanal atresia, laryngomalacia, Pierre Robin syndrome
  • Neuromuscular disease: phrenic nerve inury, neonatal myasthenia gravis

Diffusion Impairment


  • Pulmonary edema: left-sided obstructive cardiac disease (aortic stenosis), cardiomyopathy
  • Pulmonary fibrosis

Decrease Hemoglobin O2 affinity


  • Methemoglobinemia (congenital, drugs)

Decrease Peripheral circulation (peripheral cyanosis)


  • Sepsis, shock of any cause, polycythemia, hypothermia, hypoglycemia, low cardiac output (hypocalcemia, cardiomyopathies, etc)

Investigation:

CBC
             Increase or decrease  WBC : sepsis
  • Hematocrit > 65% : polycythemia

Serum glucose:

  • to detect hypoglycemia

Arterial Blood Gases (ABGs):


  • Arterial PO2: to confirm central cyanosis : SaO2 not as good an indicator due to  Increase fetal Hb affinity for O2 (left-shift)
  • Increase PaCO2: may indicate pulmonary or CNS disorders, heart failure
  • Decrease pH: sepsis, circulatory shock, severe hypoxemia
  • Methemoglobinemia: Decrease SaO2, normal PaO2, chocolate-brown blood

Hyperoxia test:


  • Administer 100 % oxygen for > 10 min
  • PaO2 > 100 mmHg: pulmonary disease likely
  • PaO2 < 70 mmHg, rise by < 30 mmHg or SaO2 unchanged:  cardiac cause (R-L shunt) likely
  • Total anomalous pulmonary venous return may respond
  • Pulmonary disease with a massive intrapulmonary shunt may not respond

Pre-ductal & Post-ductal PaO2 or SaO2 measurements (pre- and post- ductus arteriosus):


  • Preductal artery (right radial) PaO2 10 – 15 mmHg > post ductal artery  (umbilical artery line) PaO2 : R – L ductal shunt (e.g., pulmonary diseases, commonly PPHN)
  • SaO2 can also be measured (right hand & right or left leg) : significant if > 10-15 % difference.
CXR
          To identify pulmonary causes of cyanosis:  pneumothorax, pulmonary  hypoplasia, diaphragmatic hernia, pulmonary edema, pleural effusion, etc.
  • Useful in evaluating congenital heart disease:  e.g., cardiomegaly & vascular congestion: heart failure
    • TGA : egg-on-a-string (anterior/posterior relationship of great vessels)
    • TOF : boot-shaped heart (RVH)
    • TAPVR :  snowman, figure 8 (anomalous drainage chamber in superior mediastinum)

Echocardiography


  • Indicated if abnormal cardiac examination suggestive of congenital heart defect, failed hyperoxia test (cardiac disease suspected) or has unclear diagnosis

  • An infant who fails the hyperoxia test & does not have PPHN or a CXR showing pulmonary disease likely has a congenital heart defect that’s ductus-dependent.

Limping neonate:
now we have to look into hypotonia of the neonate. At least 35 to 40 differnt conditions can give limp (hypotonia) of muscle but we need to focus which also cause  limping.
Seizure, hypoglycaemia, sepsis  etc.
 
Hypotonia in Neonate and Infants:
Hypotonia is reduced resistance to passive movement of joints. The deficit causing hypotonia originate in the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerves, neuromuscular junction, and muscle. There are also non-neuromuscular entities that may be associated with hypotonia including:
1.     Prematurity
2.     Hypothyroidism
3.     Rickets
4.     Malnutrition
5.     Kernicterus
6.     Storage diseases
7.     Down Syndrome
8.     Sepsis
9.     Congestive Heart failure
10.  Hypoglycemia
The differential diagnosis of hypotonia is organized anatomically in to central and peripheral causes. Peripheral hypotonia is further divided into disorders of anterior horn cells, peripheral nerves, neuromuscular junction, and muscle. In general, a good history, physical examination, and neurologic exam will lead to the diagnosis.
Characteristicshypotonia (60-80% of cases)
History:
·      Seizures
·      Delay in attaining normal milestones
PE:
·      Don’t track visually
·      Fail to imitate facial gestures
·      Lethargic and less alter
·      Hyperactive DTRs, clones, persistence of primitive reflexes
·      Poor head control
Characteristics of Peripheral Hypotonia (15-30% of cases)
History:
·      Normal sleep-wake patterns
·      Feeding difficulties
PE:
·      Responds appropriately to surroundings
·      Profound generalized weakness
·      Absent reflexes
Central Hypotonia
Hypoxic encephalopathy (19% of cases)
Intracranial hemorrhage
Perinatal trauma
Infections – meningitis or encephalitis
Structural abnormalities
Chromosomal and Genetic abnormalities (31%)
·      Tiresome 21 (Downs Syndrome)
o   Characteristic features: hypotonia, mental retardation, and congenital heart defects
o   Dysmorphic features present in neonates: flat facial profile and nasal bridge, short neck with excess uncial folds, single transverse palmer crease, upslanting palpebral fissures
·      Fragile X
o   Genetic defect: expansion of trinucleotide repeat (CGG) on X chromosome
o   Hypotonia is mild and kids are usually diagnosed after failure to meet developmental milestones
o   Characteristic features: mental retardation, autistic features, macrocephaly, large ears, increased testicular size in puberty
·      Prader-Willi syndrome:
o   Characteristic features: hypotonia, hypogonadism, mental retardation, short stature, and obesity
o   Genetic defect: deletion of paternal copy of long arm of chromosome 15q11-13 or maternal uniparental dismay
Now we have differential for both" blue" and "limp" baby  , common are hypoglycaemia, sepsis, seizure, structural abnormalities...  so we need some more data from the docket....proper vitals including  Spo2 & RBG further CBC and routine blood work will help, clinically detailed resp and cvs examination data are important, reflexes should be noted,-----IMPLY PROPER Examination
and documentation.

FREE ACCESS

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Clinical efficacy vs teaching effectiveness


Emerg Med J2011;28:37-39 doi:10.1136/emj.2009.077743

No relationship between measures of clinical efficiency and teaching effectiveness for emergency medicine faculty

  1. Tomer Begaz1,
  2. M Chris Decker1,
  3. Robert Treat2,
  4. Matthew Tews1
+ Author Affiliations
  1. 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
  2. 2Office of Education Services, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
  1. Correspondence to Tomer Begaz, Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; tbegaz@mcw.edu
  1. Contributors TB: primary author and guarantor. TB conceived the study, wrote the protocol and paper. MCD: contributed to the concept, design, and major revisions to paper. RT: study design, data analysis, and significant contributions to editing the paper. MT: significant editorial contribution to paper.
  • Accepted 20 January 2010
  • Published Online First 26 June 2010

Abstract

Objectives Emergency medicine (EM) doctors affiliated with academic institutions experience professional tension between providing excellent, timely care for patients and high-quality bedside instruction for residents and medical students. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between measures of faculty clinical efficiency and teaching effectiveness.
Methods This was a retrospective review of data from a single academic institution with an annual census of 55 000. Faculty clinical efficiency was measured by two variables: the relative value unit (RVU)/h ratio and average ‘door to discharge’ time. Teaching effectiveness was estimated by determining the average ‘overall teaching’ scores derived from anonymous EM resident and senior medical student evaluations. Relationships were assessed using the Spearman's correlation coefficient.
Results There was no statistically significant relationship (p>0.050) between measures of faculty clinical efficiency and teaching effectiveness.
Conclusion These data replicate previous findings that clinical productivity has no correlation with teaching effectiveness for emergency medicine faculty doctors.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Elderly: Less Likely to Get Adequate Analgesia


Elderly Emergency Patients Less Likely to Receive Pain Medication Than Middle-Aged Patients

 A new study finds that people 75 years old or older are less likely to receive any pain medication in hospital emergency departments than middle aged people -- those between 35 and 54 years old.

And these differences remained even after researchers took into account how much pain the patients were having, said Timothy F. Platts-Mills, MD, lead author of the study and assistant professor of emergency medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine.



For example, among older adults reporting severe pain, 67 percent received pain medication, compared to 79 percent of middle aged patients with severe pain.

"We're not exactly sure why this happens," Platts-Mills said. "It may be because physicians are more concerned about potential side effects in this population.

"To us, the gap we observe in pain management for older patients highlights the need to better understand how best to manage pain in older patients and understand the barriers to doing this. All patients, regardless of age, deserve to have relief from pain, especially when it is severe. Our group is actively investigating the side effects of commonly used pain medication and the impact of pain on functional outcomes after injury in older adults. We think that for most older emergency department patients providing effective treatment for acute pain is likely to result in a substantial net benefit," Platts-Mills said.

The study was published online ahead of print by the journal Annals of Emergency Medicine.

Emergency departments (EDs) are an important source of acute care for older adults, with over 20 million ED visits by patients 65 and older each year. Almost half of these visits are for the evaluation and treatment of pain.

Platts-Mills and study co-authors conducted a secondary analysis of data collected from U.S. emergency departments between 2003 and 2009 in order to test the hypothesis that older adults who come to the ED with a primary complaint of pain are less likely to receive pain medication than younger patients.

Their results show that 49 percent of patients 75 and older received an analgesic (such as morphine, oxycodone, or ibuprofen), compared to 68.3 percent of middle-aged patients. Similarly, 34.8 percent of the elderly patients received an opioid (such as morphine or oxycodone) compared to 49.3 percent among the middle-aged.

These differences persisted even after the statistical analyses were adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, pain severity and other factors. Elderly patients were 19.6 percent less likely to receive an analgesic and 14.6 percent less likely to receive an opioid than middle-aged patients.

Platts-Mills said further research is needed to better understand the long-term impact of acute pain management for older emergency department patients, assess strategies to minimize adverse effects from pain medications, and examine the role of non-pharmacologic pain management for this population.

Dr. Platts-Mills' research is supported by an institutional career development award from the NIH. Co-authors of the study are Denise A. Esserman, PhD; UNC medical student D. Levin Brown; Andrey V. Bortsov, MD, PhD; Philip D. Sloane, MD, MPH; and Samuel A. McLean, MD, MPH. All are from the UNC School of Medicine, the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health or UNC's Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research.

Triage: Disagreement

Research article

Be careful with triage in emergency departments: interobserver agreement on 1,578 patients in France

Anne-Claire Durand email, Stephanie Gentile email, Patrick Gerbeaux email, Marc Alazia email, Pierre Kiegel email, Stephane Luigi email, Eric Lindenmeyer email, Philippe Olivier email, Marie-Annick Hidoux email and Roland Sambuc email
BMC Emergency Medicine 2011, 11:19doi:10.1186/1471-227X-11-19
Published:31 October 2011

Abstract (provisional)


Background

For several decades, emergency departments (EDs) utilization has increased, inducing ED overcrowding in many countries. This phenomenon is related partly to an excessive number of nonurgent patients. To resolve ED overcrowding and to decrease nonurgent visits, the most common solution has been to triage the ED patients to identify potentially nonurgent patients, i.e. which could have been dealt with by general practitioner. The objective of this study was to measure agreement among ED health professionals on the urgency of an ED visit, and to determine if the level of agreement is consistent among different sub-groups based on following explicit criteria: age, medical status, type of referral to the ED, investigations performed in the ED, and the discharge from the ED.

Methods

We conducted a multicentric cross-sectional study to compare agreement between nurses and physicians on categorization of ED visits into urgent or nonurgent. Subgroups stratified by criteria characterizing the ED visit were analyzed in relation to the outcome of the visit.

Results

Of 1,928 ED patients, 350 were excluded because data were lacking. The overall nurse-physician agreement on categorization was moderate (kappa = 0.43). The levels of agreement within all subgroups were variable and low. The highest agreement concerned three subgroups of complaints: cranial injury (kappa = 0.61), gynaecological (kappa = 0.66) and toxicology complaints (kappa = 1.00). The lowest agreement concerned two subgroups: urinary-nephrology (kappa = 0.09) and hospitalization (kappa = 0.20). When categorization of ED visits into urgent or nonurgent cases was compared to hospitalization, ED physicians had higher sensitivity and specificity than nurses (respectively 94.9% versus 89.5%, and 43.1% versus 30.9%).

Conclusions

The lack of physician-nurse agreement and the inability to predict hospitalization have important implications for patient safety. When urgency screening is used to determine treatment priority, disagreement might not matter because all patients in the ED are seen and treated. But using assessments as the basis for refusal of care to potential nonurgent patients raises legal, ethical, and safety issues. Managed care organizations should be cautious when applying such criteria to restrict access to EDs.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Syncope in Pregnancy

Fainting (Syncope) During Pregnancy

What is syncope? Syncope is a brief loss of consciousness and postural change often caused by a brief decrease in blood flow to the brain.

How common is syncope (AKA "fainting" or "loss of consciousness") during pregnancy? Approximately 4.6% of women suffer from at least one episode of syncope during pregnancy. 28.2% of women interviewed reported a pre-syncopal episode including the symptoms of dizziness, lightheadedness, nausea, sweating and potentially collapsing to the floor.

What causes syncope? During pregnancy women's veins dilate in response to increased hormones from the placenta. This in turn causes a pooling effect that causes a decrease in cardiac output and a decrease in blood pressure. In susceptible individuals the vagus nerve is then stimulated causing a "paradoxical" (i.e. counter-intuitive) reaction of yet-again increased vein dilation and a slowing of the heart. In essence, in the pregnant woman's body this can occur due to the body trying to compensate for what appears to be a loss of blood. This is the cause of fainting 99% of the time.

What else can cause syncope? 1% of the time syncope can be due to more serious conditions such as heart disease, brain tumors, blood clots, seizures, abnormal heart beat, low blood sugar and other blood chemistry abnormalities.

What tests should be done? Start with a history and physical exam by a health professional. You may be asked to list the symptoms you had before the episode: palpitations, shortness of breath, chest pain, lightheadedness. Were you hydrated well? How long did the episode last? Did you injure yourself when you fell? The physical exam may include vital signs, heart and neurological exam. Some physicians may get an EKG if they believe your heart may be involved. Many times, there is no need for additional testing. In the rare instance that something more serious than a vagal response is considered, your health care provider may order blood tests, additional heart monitoring or consultations from other health professionals.

What is the prognosis for the fetus and should additional testing be done? The prognosis for the fetus is excellent. In general, no additional testing is necessary.

What general recommendations do we make to pregnant patients with a history of syncope? Get up slowly when changing positions. If you must stand for a prolonged period of time, make sure to move your legs. Remain well hydrated. Eat regular meals to maintain a steady blood sugar. Identify your syncopal triggers and avoid them. If symptoms persist, see your health care provider. The condition will most likely resolve after delivery.
Reference: Yarlagadda S, Poma PA, Green LS, Katz V. Syncope during pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010; 115(2)377-80.

Syncope : The Pointers

1.History, physical examination, and electrocardiography are the core of the syncope workup (combined diagnostic yield, 50%).
2. Neurologic testing is rarely helpful unless additional neurologic signs or symptoms are present (diagnostic yield of electroencephalography, computed tomography, and Doppler ultrasonography, 2% to 6%).
3. Patients in whom heart disease is known or suspected or those with exertional syncope are at higher risk for adverse outcomes and should have cardiac testing, including echocardiography, stress testing, Holter monitoring, or intracardiac electrophysiologic studies, alone or in combination (diagnostic yields, 5% to 35%).  4. Syncope in the elderly often results from polypharmacy and abnormal physiologic responses to daily events. 5. Long-term loop electrocardiography (diagnostic yield, 25% to 35%) and tilt testing (diagnostic yield ≤ 60%) are most useful in patients with recurrent syncope in whom heart disease is not suspected.
6. Psychiatric evaluation can detect mental disorders associated with syncope in up to 25% of cases.
 7. Hospitalization may be indicated for patients at high risk for cardiac syncope (those with an abnormal electrocardiogram, organic heart disease, chest pain, history of arrhythmia, age >70 years) or with acute neurologic signs. ( source: Annals of Internal Medicine vol. 126 no. 12 989-996)